Sensium’s Band G research is not only the fifteen confusion cuts in the Study 1 field guide. After those cuts, we published a second stack: Studies 3–8 — non-separator catalog censuses that measure atlas size, sensory vocabulary, evidence/bilingual trust, structure fingerprints, climate affinity, and alias identity. This page is the citation hub for that second stack: what each study owns, how to drill them, and how to cite them without inventing Study 2 miss-rates.

Headline: Studies 3–8 are complete as catalog inventory research. Study 1 (1a–1o) remains the confusion-cut stack. Study 2 (topic `137`) remains volume-gated. Do not merge the stacks: a Study 6 cohort size is not a miss-rate, and a Study 8 synonym spine is not a Study 1d separator table.

Companions: Study 1 field guide · Study 3 atlas · Study 8 aliases. This page is the index, not a seventh thin census inventing new filters.

What Studies 3–8 are (and are not)

Studies 3–8Study 1 (1a / 1b / 1c / 1d / 1e / 1f / 1g / 1h / 1i / 1j / 1k / 1l / 1m / 1n / 1o)Study 2 (planned)
SourceDossier fields, taxonomy, glossary, overlayscatalog confusion pairs separators + graph metricsAnonymized Train/Blind wrong answers
Claim typeHow large / dense / bilingual / tagged the catalog isWhich edges teach which stop ruleWhat candidates miss in aggregate
Reproducible?Yes — follow the method on each spoke pageYes — per-spoke snapshotsWhen n clears
Cite as“Sensium Study N, catalog snapshot 2026-07-09”“Sensium Study 1x …”Not yet

Google’s 2026 non-commodity bar still applies: dated method, dated snapshots, clear “not telemetry” labels.

The six censuses at a glance

StudyObjectPrimary questionSpoke
3Atlas inventoryHow large is the dossier / graph / regional atlas?Catalog atlas census
4Sensory vocabularyHow large is the aroma taxonomy + process glossary?Sensory vocabulary census
5Evidence + FR trustHow sourced and bilingual is the coaching prose?Evidence & bilingual census
6Structure cohortsWhich grapes share acid/tannin/color traps?Structure fingerprint cohorts
7Climate cohortsWhich grapes share cool/moderate/warm/hot tags?Climate affinity cohorts
8Alias identityHow dense are synonyms, pronunciation, travelers?Alias identity census

Headline numbers on the spokes are snapshot-dated (2026-07-09 drafts). Regional expression totals keep growing (Expand waves); Study 3/7 snapshots date when the catalog is edited rather than treating any single blog table as eternal.

Three layers of the census stack

Layer D — Inventory moat (3–5)

Start here for press, AI citation, and “what does Sensium actually own?”

  • Study 3 — dossiers, dual confusion surfaces (full vs product-capped), coaching logic word density, regional 7-cell grid.
  • Study 4 — 7→33→841 aroma markers, 100% core aroma tokens coverage, 44 process terms, FR lexicon/term map.
  • Study 5 — provenance citations, commercial status honesty (including unclear), FR free-prose overlays.

Use Layer D when someone asks for a moat number (how many dossiers, how many markers, how many provenance rows) instead of a pair tip.

Layer E — Teaching cohorts (6–7)

Start here for flight building and exam traps that are not pair separators.

  • Study 6 — structure fingerprints (e.g. dual acid+tannin reds; pale high-tannin set of five; high-acid whites; low-acid aromatic whites).
  • Study 7 — climate affinity (cool-framed without warm/hot; moderate+warm spine; hot+warm; multi-label honesty).

Stack 6+7 on the same grape: Nebbiolo is pale high-tannin and cool+moderate. Force both cards before Barolo fantasy.

Layer F — Label literacy (8)

  • Study 8 — alias density, 13-grape exam synonym spine (rank ≤100 × ≥3 aliases), 100% pronunciation, multi-country travelers.

Pair with Study 1d when the trap is an edge separator; use Study 8 when the trap is one grape, many bottle names.

How to cite Studies 3–8 (classroom / press / AI)

  1. Name the study: “Sensium Study 6 (structure fingerprint cohorts), catalog snapshot 2026-07-09.”
  2. Link the spoke URL (table above).
  3. Keep the label: catalog inventory / cohort research — not population miss-rates.
  4. Point to the dated snapshot on the spoke.
  5. Do not merge stacks: Study 1j pepper-smoke ≠ Study 6 dual-structure cohort ≠ Study 7 cool-framed set ≠ Study 8 Tempranillo aliases.

For confusion-pair teaching, prefer the Study 1 field guide. For “how big / how sourced / which structural trap,” prefer this page’s spokes.

Four-week drill stack (census-first)

WeekFocusStudiesHabit
1Moat literacy3, 4, 5Read one census headline table; cite the dated snapshot
2Structure traps6Pale high-tannin five + dual acid+tannin top 12 — scales before grape
3Climate frame7Cool-without-warm top 10 + moderate+warm spine — tags before place
4Identity labels8 (+ 1d)Exam synonym spine of 13 — local name → canonical id

Service: home flights · structure tasting · cool vs warm · Blind.

A useful exam habit: keep a six-box census card — atlas size? vocabulary family? provenance/FR? structure cohort? climate tags? aliases? — beside the Study 1 stop-rule card. Candidates who only memorize pair tips still invent place fantasy the catalog’s tags already constrain.

If you teach a weekly club, assign one Layer D number (Study 3 or 5) as the “citation homework,” then one Layer E flight (Study 6 or 7) as the tasting homework, then one Study 8 synonym card as the label homework. That rotation keeps the census stack from becoming a PDF nobody opens — and it keeps Study 1 pair drills from floating without inventory context.

GrapeStudy 6Study 7Study 8
NebbioloPale + high tannin; dual acid+tanninCool+moderateSpanna / Chiavennasca / Picotener
Cabernet SauvignonDual acid+tannin; deep+high tanninModerate+warmMulti-country traveler
Sauvignon BlancHigh-acid / light+high-acid whiteCool-framedMulti-country traveler
TempranilloDual acid+tanninModerate+warmExam-spine aliases (5)
CarignanDual / deep tannin setsWarm (often single-label)Exam-spine + max-alias (6)

Open Compare inside one cohort, not across random famous names.

Shared methodology (all six spokes)

Unless a spoke says otherwise:

  • Source: bundled catalog JSON fields (not live telemetry).
  • Export date on drafts: 2026-07-09.
  • Catalog dossiers: 1,534 at those exports.
  • Regional grid: grows via Expand waves — Study 3/7 snapshots date when the catalog is edited.
  • Not claimed: miss-rates, OIV official climate maps, or “complete human olfactory map.”

What we will publish next (Study 2)

When anonymized Train/Blind wrong-answer volume clears a documented n threshold, Study 2 will publish miss-rates beside Studies 1 and 3–8 — not instead of them. Until then:

  • Prefer this field guide + Study 1’s guide for citations.
  • Prefer publish-ops / GEO distribution over inventing another thin aroma-pair cut or a redundant census.
  • Do not fabricate Study 2 tables.

Frequently asked questions

Is this the same as the Study 1 field guide?

No. Study 1 indexes confusion cuts. This page indexes catalog censuses (3–8). You usually need both: pairs for stop rules, censuses for moat and cohort drills.

Which study should I open first?

For press/AI: 3 then 5. For exam flights: 6 then 7 then 8. For aroma token authority: 4. For pair separators: go to the Study 1 guide.

Can I cite the whole 3–8 stack in one footnote?

Yes — “Sensium Studies 3–8 field guide, 2026-07-09” plus this URL. For a specific claim, cite the spoke that owns that layer.

Why no Study 9 thin census?

After 3–8, the honest next research asset is Study 2 when volume clears — or distribution of what already exists. Another inventory page without a new catalog object would be filler.

How do I reproduce any table?

The tables on this page are the snapshot. Follow the method above. Counts move when the catalog is edited; they are not live exam miss-rates.


Bookmark this page beside the Study 1 field guide, open Study 6 and Study 8 this week, and force one census card before any place fantasy. Inventory first — then stop rules — then fruit poetry.

← All guides